Turn Advertising Off
 
Movie Showtimes & Tickets
Showtimes By City or Zip Code:
Film Search:
    NEW>Full Movies!        Movie News        Top Stories      Theatrical Release Dates      Movie Pictures      Trailers & Clips      Listen to Movie Soundtracks

300 (2007)

"The most overrated film of the year...which needed to cut down on the slow-mo shots."

This film was based on a graphic novel which featured the factual battle of Thermopaly, but both the novel and the film fucked up the only good facts there were to make it all in the Spartan's favor, and cut out the ones that made them look the way they really were (kinda like when Constantine edited the Bible).

Yes, I know this is based on a Frank Miller graphic novel, and no, it doesn't make up for the 6 following reasons why I gave this film a 1.5 overall:

First off, there were 300 Spartans yes, but were also 1,000 Greeks at their side, and no, they didn't all run away like cowards.

Secondly, I hate to say it for those who liked it, but there was nothing monstrous about the appearance of the Persians, and therefore it was kinda racist to make them that way, especially when Zack's omitting the facts of WHY this incident occurred in the first place, and the number of soldiers present to defend the area. And the actual freaks & monsters in the Persian Army made absolutely no sense. Plus at this time in history, the Persians had the finest army the world over that not even 1,300 soldiers could hold off w/out the geological advantage they had.

Thirdly, anyone can make a movie or write a novel BASED/INSPIRED off a historic incident, but they can't omit or change facts in doing so, especially not both. The Spartans and Greeks were going back on a treaty with Persia that was AGREED UPON by the RULERS of Sparta and Greece THEMSELVES, and therefore, as much of a warlord Xerxes was, this invasion was the only rational one that he embarked on. Seeing as the Greek and Spartan end of the bargain wasn't being fulfilled. And sure, Xerxes would only SAY that was his excuse, but we all know he would have invaded anyway. The Greeks and Spartans were even smart enough to know that. BUT, they also knew that Persia would benefit too much if they obeyed the arms/trade treaties, and therefore would also know that Xerxes wouldn't dare invade if said treaties were being fulfilled. So that makes it like a contradictory statement: Xerxes would invade, but would ONLY give that excuse for the SAKE of having a reason to invade, but he also wouldn't do it cuz the treaty would benefit Persia too much. So Xerxes would just be a jackass to rationalize the invasion at all, though the Greeks and Spartans coulda saved themselves if they just HONORED the treaty THEY AGREED TO. And it's not like it would be any skin off their bones. It was working out alright BEFORE they canceled the deal.

Fourthly, a "TV Spot" has the simple agenda of showing you as much appealing footage as possible in less than 30 seconds time, and therefore, action scenes were in regular speed, if not sped up. And that made it look way cooler, and more believable, versus the tons of slow motion footage that dominates this film. I mean it was like my PC when downloading a 2 and ½ minute trailer: It does it in little 2 second beats over the course of an hour an twenty minutes; The footage playing and stopping, playing and stopping, playing and stopping. And like, sudden jolting stops as well. That's what all the action of the film felt/looked like. It was like: "Am I on the Indiana Jones adventure ride? Cuz I'm pretty sure I was in line for Space Mountain." And I was watching this on a friend's DVD on a big screen TV.

Fifthly, sorry folks, but Xerxes never offered Leonidas a plea deal face to face. That would just contradict his vicious character that Snyder set him up to be like. Oh wait! He DID do that! So that does contradict the charisma of the character. And, since Xerxes never cared of how many soldiers died to win the fight, just as long as he won it (just like Agamemnon from "Troy"), then he wouldn't bother to offer a plea deal to Leonidas at all (which he didn't in reality). And he would have won too, since 10,000 on 300 wouldn't take long, even with the geological advances. Oh wait! He did THAT too! So nevermind, he did contradict the character on that basis as well. The confrontation was a good scene though.

And sixthly, there was absolutely no character development after the first half hour or so. I mean you get the idea that Leonidas will sacrifice himself and the 300 to hold off the Persians, but nothing happens with the characters that changes after they set off to the location of the battle.

So just change those few things and you would have had a GOOD movie on your hands, but no. It was just way too overrated and crappy for the genre.

Slow motion can be a good thing, but not when it's used so much in a film like this. It looked SO MUCH BETTER in the trailers than in the actual movie.

I'd have expected better from a film like this, considering the hype it got. And sure, I understand that Snyder wasn't out to make an epic, but at least he coulda stuck with the truth some more and cut down on the ever annoying slow motion shots. Some were cool, but it seemed way too overused for me. Hence why the visuals didn't come off as great, since they were always locked in a freeze frame...seemingly.

8 Comments & Responses


September 10th, 2008 10:32am
Snyder knocked this out of the park, it was great. It was based on the graphic novel, it wasn't a history lesson.
 
July 13th, 2008 11:12pm
"Immortals", I think is what you two are talking about, or the big orc-like creatures, and I think it was made as if someone was telling a story, adding elements here, that are not true, exaggerating this visual that didn't really happen, saying this happened to hype up the battle, probably like in the end, to get the troops moral up, well that was how I interoperated it as, someone turning a mundane battle into something spectacular for their audience, kind of like the comic book dose, because in the documentary of the 300, its more boring and not seen as something to care that much about, and not as exciting as the movie portrays it to be, or maybe you two just don't like because you don't like it.

By the By, I liked the Immortals, they reminded me of ninjas, and is another life size collectable statue I'm going to have in my house.

The BlizZzard
 
June 4th, 2008 3:22pm
Agreed!! I forgot about those monster thing as well. That really does bury the coffin on this flick. And the acting was bad. Just a screaming lead who had maurder on the brain.
 
June 4th, 2008 3:06pm
i agree with you on this one. this movie was terrible and it was VERY overrated. the graphics were retarded and did not make the movie more interesting or intriguing, just made it that more pointless. the plot line did not even resemble to what did happen in history. also the weird creatures in the movie put the nail on the coffin. the only thing good about this movie was the fact that it kinda resembled what is going around the U.S. and sending troops( Spartans) to war. thats the best thing of the whole movie.
 
June 4th, 2008 2:51pm
I edited the errors in the review that were actual errors. Other than that, I get that this was a guy flick, but it just wasn't entertaining to watch Leonidas and the 300 just find more interesting ways to kill people in the masses. You get the whole story in the first 30 minutes or so. Not enough depth, or character development, which seemed really significant to me.
 
June 4th, 2008 6:16am
somehow I believe you dug too deep. And if you werent watching this on a computer you may have actually appreciated it. The slow motion was added perfectly during the action scenes, when they break loose and leonidas goes on that killing rampage, thats priceless. I think you cut the movie down for the wrong reasons, although this movie was based on factual evidence, it does not boast its facts nor flaunt a "based on true events" logo like some movies tend to do. The movie brought the action and kept the history.. you are just a little too skeptical. Because unlike you, out of 30 total reviews on here, it averaged a 4.5, so its still an out of the ballpark homerun for zack snyder as Travis pointed out.
 
June 4th, 2008 4:30am
Actually, this isn't a frank miller film. He wrote the graphic novel the film's based on, but zack snyder adapted it into a film.
 
June 4th, 2008 1:05am
I like the research involved with your review, very thourough. I do agree that they shouldnt have edited the true story, but they only did it to make it more appealing and have a clear good guy and clear bad guy, which they do in alot of movies. They change the story to better fit a "movie stereotype story" IF you get what I am saying. But I feel that visuals in the movie were amazing. I think they should get more credit on that. I dont think the acting deserved a one star, but i also think it didnt deserve a 4 star either. I found 300 to be very very very entertaining. I feel it was ment to be a guy flick and alot of guy flicks dont really need to make that much sense, they just need action! and this movie delivered the action. I like the slow motion to fast motion too, it gave it a certain feel. which i liked alot. Anyways I loved the review, even though i may not agree with some, I still liked it. And I love the Disneyland reference!
 

1.5
  Stars
Story:
Acting:
Directing:
Visuals:
Reviewed: June 3rd, 2008
More of My Reviews:
Was this review helpful?

0 Users

0 Users
Average Score:
4 Stars
Viewing
35 of 42
JR's Profile
JR
5

Stars
"awsome"